Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:46

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Video: Street Fighter 6 Showcases Four New Character Outfits - Nintendo Life
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
This $1 Food Could Help Fight Diabetes and Heart Disease - SciTechDaily
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
NASA Hides The Emmy It Just Won (Update) - NASA Watch
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Apple’s Music app in iOS 26 gains my favorite feature from the Mac - 9to5Mac
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Austria’s deadliest mass shooting: Who are the Graz victims, shooter? - Al Jazeera
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.